20170524 APOLOGETICS OR THEOLOGY
Readings at Mass
Liturgical
Colour: White.
First reading
|
Acts
17:15,22-18:1 ©
|
Paul’s escort took
him as far as Athens, and went back with instructions for Silas and Timothy to
rejoin Paul as soon as they could.
So Paul
stood before the whole Council of the Areopagus and made this speech:
‘Men of
Athens, I have seen for myself how extremely scrupulous you are in all
religious matters, because I noticed, as I strolled round admiring your sacred
monuments, that you had an altar inscribed: To An Unknown God. Well, the God
whom I proclaim is in fact the one whom you already worship without knowing it.
‘Since
the God who made the world and everything in it is himself Lord of heaven and
earth, he does not make his home in shrines made by human hands. Nor is he
dependent on anything that human hands can do for him, since he can never be in
need of anything; on the contrary, it is he who gives everything –
including life and breath – to everyone. From one single stock he not only
created the whole human race so that they could occupy the entire earth, but he
decreed how long each nation should flourish and what the boundaries of its
territory should be. And he did this so that all nations might seek the deity
and, by feeling their way towards him, succeed in finding him. Yet in fact he
is not far from any of us, since it is in him that we live, and move, and
exist, as indeed some of your own writers have said:
“We are all his
children.”
‘Since we are the
children of God, we have no excuse for thinking that the deity looks like
anything in gold, silver or stone that has been carved and designed by a man.
‘God
overlooked that sort of thing when men were ignorant, but now he is telling
everyone everywhere that they must repent, because he has fixed a day when the
whole world will be judged, and judged in righteousness, and he has appointed a
man to be the judge. And God has publicly proved this by raising this man from
the dead.’
At this
mention of rising from the dead, some of them burst out laughing; others said,
‘We would like to hear you talk about this again.’ After that Paul left them,
but there were some who attached themselves to him and became believers, among
them Dionysius the Areopagite and a woman called Damaris, and others besides.
After
this, Paul left Athens and went to Corinth.
Responsorial
Psalm
|
Psalm
148:1-2,11-14 ©
|
Your glory fills
all heaven and earth.
or
Alleluia!
Praise the Lord from
the heavens,
praise
him in the heights.
Praise him, all his
angels,
praise
him, all his host.
Your glory fills
all heaven and earth.
or
Alleluia!
All earth’s kings and
peoples,
earth’s
princes and rulers,
young men and
maidens,
old men
together with children.
Your glory fills
all heaven and earth.
or
Alleluia!
Let them praise the
name of the Lord
for he
alone is exalted.
The splendour of his
name
reaches
beyond heaven and earth.
Your glory fills
all heaven and earth.
or
Alleluia!
He exalts the
strength of his people.
He is the
praise of all his saints,
of the sons of
Israel,
of the
people to whom he comes close.
Your glory fills
all heaven and earth.
or
Alleluia!
Gospel
Acclamation
|
Col3:1
|
Alleluia, alleluia!
Since you have been
brought back to true life with Christ,
you must look for the
things that are in heaven, where Christ is,
sitting at God’s
right hand.
Alleluia!
Or
|
Jn14:16
|
Alleluia, alleluia!
I shall ask the
Father,
and he will give you
another Advocate
to be with you for
ever.
Alleluia!
Gospel
|
John 16:12-15 ©
|
Jesus said to his
disciples:
‘I still have many
things to say to you
but they would be too
much for you now.
But when the Spirit
of truth comes
he will lead you to
the complete truth,
since he will not be
speaking as from himself
but will say only
what he has learnt;
and he will tell you
of the things to come.
He will glorify me,
since all he tells
you
will be taken from
what is mine.
Everything the Father
has is mine;
that is why I said:
All he tells you
will be taken from
what is mine.’
APOLOGETICS
OR THEOLOGY
SCRIPTURE READINGS: [
ACTS 17:15, 22-34, 18:1; JOHN 16:12-15 ]
Athens in the ancient days was a city
rich in Greek culture and religion. It was also a center for philosophy
and education. The people in this city were highly educated but also
religious minded as they worshipped many gods. Many were philosophers.
Among them were two principal groups of philosophers. One group was
called the Epicureans who taught that the goal of life was to seek happiness
through pleasure. The other group was called the Stoics. They had a
disdain for feelings and pleasure. Instead, they were more intellectual
and rose above feelings and senses to reason and discipline. Happiness in
life for them was to live a life in harmony with nature and reason.
Regardless of which philosophical position they held, their favorite past time
was to debate and engage each other on intellectual issues and expound new ideas.
They were receptive to novelty. Hence, Paul was invited by the Council of
the Areopagus to address them. It was an opportunity not to be missed by
Paul as he had an attentive audience.
But it was significant that in engaging
this audience, Paul did not go by way of apologetics but that of
theology. Today, we are faced with many intellectuals who are asking
questions about the faith. With the advent of mass media, the world has
become very complex. More questions are raised for every question that is
answered. Today, even with young people, many who are asking questions
are sincerely searching for an answer. But no answer seems to be
adequate. This is because every question can be approached from different
perspectives, science, philosophy, faith, tradition and pragmatism. No
one answer is adequate to satisfy a person with a question. So in this
bewildering state of information overload, of views and questions, many resign
to agnosticism or surrender to simple faith.
So we can either take flight or
fight. The agnostics take flight. They say that they do not know
and they do not wish to know. The simple believer on the other
hand, also take flight by fighting in an irrational manner. Falling into
fundamentalism, they reduce everything to faith without the ability to show
reasons for their faith. They would just quote the scriptures and
doctrines out of context to justify their simple faith for fear that more
discussions and discourse would shake their faith. Such faith does not
require intellectual understanding but simply to submit in faith. This
can lead to radicalism and fundamentalism. It is either you believe or
you do not. There is no middle ground or discussion possible, because
they claim to be dealing with revelation and therefore only faith is
required. But in truth there is no need to take flight or
fight! Both ignorance and apologetics will not help any serious
believer or seeker for truth.
What is the difference between
apologetics and theology? When we speak of apologetics, we are concerned
with defending our faith against detractors and heretics. In apologetics,
the fundamental objective is to defend the position that we have the
truth. In being defensive, we are often on the offensive as well.
Our task is to destroy the objections of those who find fault with our
doctrines. The objective is clear but very narrow. In most
instances, apologetics is to give short and direct answers to short and concise
questions. It is not a treatise to explain but to defend. In most
cases, apologetics are conducted against those who already know something about
our faith and where we have something in common yet disagree on some
doctrines. This is particularly true between Catholics and
Protestants. As we already share a common faith in Christ but differ in
the way we interpret the scriptures and the corollary doctrines, then it leaves
each Christian community or church to defend their doctrines, showing that they
are rooted in both scripture and tradition. Indeed, apologetics have
a place still in our faith discussion, especially with those who already have
some knowledge of the faith.
The use of apologetics is also useful for
those who lack the capacity, whether intellectually or time to have a
systematic understanding of our faith. There are many people who do not
have time to read so much information about everything. That is why young
people prefer to go into Instagram, Facebook and tweeters. Today, even
blog is out of fashion because few are keen to read long discourses unless
interest is already presupposed. Otherwise, the young generation only
wants to read a one to three line sentence. Even homilies such as this,
are only read by those who are serious about their faith and their relationship
with God. The danger is that our modern generation, which is
bombarded with so much information on the internet, is taking flight by
choosing to read only short messages. This perhaps is the cause of much
misunderstanding, misinterpretation and accusation, leading to social disorder
and even rioting. We all know how a picture, a video or just an extract
of a speech taken out of context, when put on social media, can instantaneously
go viral and cause either enormous outbursts of sympathy or anger, often
without consideration of the full story of what really happened.
Unfortunately, the reality is that if we
are really keen in knowing the truth of something, we must invest time to
investigate, to read widely and to see the logic behind the propositions.
Jumping to conclusion without proper study or believing something from hearsay
can do us more harm than good. Fanatics, whether religious or
ideological, abound in this world and are often the cause of severe harm to the
unity of peoples.
For this reason, the way forward is
through theology, which is a systematic, logical and holistic presentation of
doctrines and faith. A theologian should not be confused with a simple
believer, even though all in some ways theologize, even if done naively.
Unlike a simple faith believer who justifies his position from his
experience and his own level of thought, a theologian does not base his
arguments simply on his own experience, but he goes through the history of the
Church, the Fathers of the Church, the tradition, the other religions, the scriptures,
the development of doctrines, the different theological positions, the
contribution of science and particularly philosophy, so that he can present a
systematic understanding of the continuity and progress of a doctrine in a
logical manner. At the same time, he must show that what he holds as a
doctrine of faith must also be consistent and coherent with the other doctrines
held by the Church. No doctrine can contradict other doctrines because
that would be inconsistent and contradictory.
It is within this context that we can
appreciate the approach of St Paul in his dealings with the Greek philosophers.
He began with where they were. Unlike his dealings with the Jews,
where it was appropriate for him to employ the methodology of apologetics
because the Jews and Christians shared a common faith in the scriptures and the
prophets, with the Greek philosophers, the Jewish scriptures would have made no
sense to them. So he began with their experience and their beliefs.
He began by acknowledging their faith in God and their religiosity. “Men
of Athens, I have seen for myself how extremely scrupulous you are in all
religious matters, because I noticed, as I strolled round admiring your sacred
monuments, that you had an altar inscribed: To An Unknown God. Well, the God
whom I proclaim is in fact the one whom you already worship without knowing
it.”
From this common faith that the
Christians and Greeks shared in the Sacred, Paul enlightened them further, that
“since the God who made the world and everything in it is himself Lord of
heaven and earth, he does not make his home in shrines made by human
hands.” He continued to argue systematically that “he is not far from any
of us, since it is in him that we live, and move, and exist, as indeed some of
your own writers have said: We are all his children.’” Then he came to the
fundamental point of his thesis. “’Since we are the children of God, we
have no excuse for thinking that the deity looks like anything in gold, silver
or stone that has been carved and designed by man. ‘God overlooked that sort of
thing, when men were ignorant, but now he is telling everyone everywhere that
they must repent, because he has fixed a day when the whole world will be
judged, and judged in righteousness, and he has appointed a man to be the
judge. And God has publicly proved this by raising this man from the dead.’”
This is an important consideration.
In His systematic presentation, he began with reason but ended with faith in
Christ. Theology is not complete without presenting Jesus as the fullness
of revelation. Although theology is a reasonable explanation of the
faith, it is not pure reason, but faith is required. When we are able to
present in a credible manner that our faith is a reasonable faith, intelligent
men can then take the leap of faith. To do so without providing the
intelligibility of what we believe and why, would only brand us as credulous
people. Even the resurrection of Christ requires us to systematically
present the logic of faith in the resurrection.
Of course, at the end of the day, after
all explanation is done, faith is required. For this reason, we should
not be surprised that we can explain all that we could, yet not all would
believe unless they are receptive to faith and humble enough to take that
leap. The response to St Paul’s preaching would not be different from
ours as well. Some were cynical and laughed at the incredible
claims of Jesus’ resurrection. Others said, “we would like to hear you
talk about this again.” Some needed more discussion but “there were some
who attached themselves to him and became believers.”
Faith and understanding come from the
Holy Spirit. Jesus told the disciples, “I still have many things to say
to you but they would be too much for you now. But when the Spirit of truth
comes he will lead you to the complete truth, since he will not be speaking as
from himself but will say only what he has learnt; and he will tell you of the
things to come. He will glorify me, since all he tells you will be taken from
what is mine.” We should therefore ask the Holy Spirit to grant us
wisdom, understanding and knowledge so that we can grow in faith. Only He
can bring us to faith. Conversion is not our work but the work of the
Holy Spirit. We are merely witnesses and catalysts and messengers.
So in seeking to convert others, according to the needs of our audience,
we can use apologetics or theology in helping people to find the fullness of
revelation in Christ, but never without praying to the Holy Spirit to touch the
minds and hearts of our listeners.
Written
by The Most Rev William Goh, Roman Catholic Archbishop of Singapore © All
Rights Reserved
No comments:
Post a Comment